Partly allowed

State Empress Transport v. Selvakumar

Madras HC10 Nov 2017CMA(MD)/1378/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court modified an award by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, reducing loss of amenities by Rs.50,000 and correcting the interest rate. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was partly allowed, directing the appellant to deposit the adjusted compensation.

What did the court decide?

Award amount reduced to Rs.5,57,830/- with 7.5% interest; appellant directed to deposit the sum within eight weeks.

State Empress Transport Vs Selvakumar — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.11.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

C.M.A.(MD)No.1378 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2015

¶6

State Express Transport Corporation Limited, Through its Managing Director, Office at Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai.

¶7

... Appellant / Respondent

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Selvakumar ... Respondent / Petitioner

¶10

Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special Sub Court, Tirunelveli made in M.C.O.P.No.364 of 2014 dated 02.06.2015.

¶11

For Appellant : Mr.P.Prabhakaran For Respondent : Mr.T.Selvakumaran

¶12

JUDGMENT

¶13

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶14

2.The appellant challenges the impugned award on the ground of quantum. The claimant was travelling in a two-wheeler, when the bus belonging to the appellant Corporation dashed against it. In the resulting accident, the claimant suffered multiple fractures. The disability suffered by him has been assessed at 60%. The claimant incurred medical expenditure to the tune of Rs.1,89,330/towards treatment alone. Though the Tribunal approached the issue from a correct perspective for fixing negligence on the driver appellant Corporation and also awarding damages under various heads, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- towards loss of amenities. It appears to be excessive. I reduce the said amount from Rs.1,50,000/- to Rs.1,00,000/-. Excepting this modification by reduction of Rs.50,000/- under the head “loss of amenities”. Similarly the award of 9% interest is also incorrect. Even the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ bank gives only 7.5% on fixed deposits. Excepting these two modifications, there is no other interference.

¶15

¶16

3.Therefore the award dated 02.06.2015 made in M.C.O.P.No.364

¶17

of 2014, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special Sub Court, Tirunelveli is modified accordingly.

¶18

4.The appellant is directed to deposit the entire compensation

¶19

amount of Rs.5,57,830/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum with costs, from the date of petition till the date of realization, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, less the amount already deposited, if any. On such deposit, the claimant is entitled to withdraw the same, less the amount already withdrawn by him, if any, by filing proper application before the Tribunal.

¶20

5.This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Tirunelveli.

¶26

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶27

+1cc to M/S.P.Prabhakaran, Advocate SR.No. 86484 +1cc to M/S.T.Selvakumaran, Advocate SR.No. 87138

¶28

C.M.A.(MD)No.1378 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2015 10.11.2017

¶29

TSG

¶30

JM/SV MMS/SAR 1/11.12.2017/2P/5C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

State Empress Transport v. Selvakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Empress Transport v. Selvakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Samuvel Stephen, Vs Suriyagandhi

Royal Sundaram Alliance Vs Murugan

P.Velusamy, Vs Chitradevi, W/O.Jeyaraman

The Managing Director, Vs Minor Aadavan

M/S.Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs Mrs.Sathiyammal

Karunalaya Pandian, Vs Ganesan