Partly allowed

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd v. Nagarajan

Madras HC2 Nov 2017CMA(MD)/1154/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court modified the compensation award in a motor accident case. Finding functional disability unestablished prevented the use of the multiplier method, leading to a reduction of the award from Rs. 3,89,500 to Rs. 3,00,000.

What did the court decide?

Compensation reduced from Rs. 3,89,500 to Rs. 3,00,000; insurer directed to deposit the sum with interest.

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd Vs Nagarajan — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 02.11.2017

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

C.M.A.(MD)No.1154 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2015

¶7

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Through its Divisional Manager, Jerome Buildings, Fort Station Road, Tiruchirappalli. ... Appellant/2

¶8

... Appellant/2^nd Respondent

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.Nagarajan ... 1^st Respondent/Petitioner

¶11

2.Parveen Travels Private Limited, No.288, Maraimalai Adigal Salai, Muthamizh Nagar, Puducherry. ...2^nd Respondent/1^st Respondent

¶12

Prayer : This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and degree dated 16.04.2015 made in M.C.O.P No.4925 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Special Subordinate Judge), Tiruchirappalli.

¶13

For Appellant : Mrs.P.Malini For Respondents : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj for R1 No Appearance for R2

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶16

2.The Insurance Company has filed this appeal challenging the award on the ground of quantum. The first respondent was riding his two-wheeler on 20.06.2011, when the accident in question occurred involving the bus belonging to the second respondent herein and insured with the appellant. The victim suffered multiple injuries including fractures. The Tribunal fixed his https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ disability at 35% which was partial but permanent. The monthly income was fixed at Rs.4,500/- The Tribunal has awarded a sum of

¶17

¶18

Rs.3,89,500/-. Contending that the said compensation awarded is excessive, this appeal has been filed.

¶19

3.The learned counsel for the appellant contended that since functional disability has not been established on the account of this accident the Tribunal ought not to have applied the multiplier method. I find force in the said contention. Therefore the compensation payable to the claimant will have to be reworked as under:-

¶20

Sl.No	Heads Amou	nt in Rupees
1.	Disability compensation 35X3000 Rs.1	,05,000/-
2.	For medical expenditure Rs.	95,000/-
3.	For transportation charges Rs.	10,000/-
4.	For extra nourishment Rs.	10,000/-
5.	For attender charges Rs.	5,000/-
6.	For loss of income Rs.	50,000/-
7.	For Pain and sufferings Rs.	25,000/-
	Total Rs.3	,00,000/-

¶21

4.The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is reduced from Rs.3,89,500/- to Rs.3,00,000/-. The award dated 16.04.2015 made in M.C.O.P No.4925 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli is accordingly modified.

¶22

5.The appellant insurance company is directed to deposit the entire compensation amount with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum with costs, from the date of petition till the date of realization, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, less the amount already deposited, if any. On such deposit, the claimant is entitled to withdraw the same, less the amount already withdrawn by him, if any, by filing proper application before the Tribunal.

¶23

6.The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶26

/True Copy/

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli.

¶31

¶32

Copy to:

¶33

The Record Keeper, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶34

2.Parveen Travels Private Limited, No.288, Maraimalai Adigal Salai, Muthamizh Nagar, Puducherry.

¶35

1 cc TO Mrs.P.Malini , Advocate in SR No. 85127 + 1 cc TO Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj , Advocate in SR No. 85048

¶36

tsg

¶37

AE/MR KKR/SAR3/23.11.2017/3P/6C

¶38

C.M.A.(MD)No.1154 of 2015 and

¶39

M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2015 02.11.2017

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd v. Nagarajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd v. Nagarajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrasekaran, Vs the General Manager

M/S.United India Insurance Co. Vs Palanisamy

The Managing Director Vs Chokku

The Managing Director Vs S.Ramasamy

The United India Insurance Co. Vs Kannammal

Chinnasamy, Vs Sellappan