Partly allowed

The Managing Director v. Minor P. Raja

Madras HC5 Jan 2017CMA/437/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed part of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal challenging motor accident compensation. Court set aside loss of income for a 7-year-old minor, enhanced attender charges, and added loss of enjoyment of amenities, reducing total award by Rs. 20,000.

What did the court decide?

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal partly allowed; total compensation reduced by Rs. 20,000; verdict adjusted to Rs. 1,81,000 including enhanced attender charges and loss of enjoyment.

The Managing Director Vs Minor P. Raja — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 05.01.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE S.VIMALA

¶2

C.M.A.No.437 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014

¶3

The Managing Director, M/s.Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation [Kumbakonam Division-II] Ltd., Periyamilaguparai, Trichy-1

¶4

... Appellant/1st respondent

¶5

Vs. 1. Minor P.Raja Rep. by his natural guardian and father Periyasamy ...1st respondent/Claimant 2. P.Veeramani

¶6

The Branch Manager, M/s.United India Insurance Co. Ltd., No.50A, Pallivasal Street, Perambalur ...2 & 3rd Respondents/ Respondents 2 & 3

¶7

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the common judgment and decree dated 31.07.2013 made in M.C.O.P.No.60 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Perambalur.

¶8

For Appellant : Mr.D.Venkatachalam For Respondents : Mr.Gopi for M/s.Royan Law Asso.

¶9

The appeal filed by the Transport Corporation, challenging the quantum of compensation awarded in M.C.O.P.No.60 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Principal District Judge, Perambalur, under which, a sum of Rs.2,01,000/has been awarded.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

The breakup details of the Award runs as under: i. Permanent disability 32% Rs. 64,000/ii.Pain and suffering Rs. 30,000/iii.Medical expenses Rs. 10,000/iv.Transport charges Rs. 10,000/v. For nutrition Rs. 10,000/vi.Loss of income during treatment @ Rs.4,500/- p.m. for 6 months Rs. 27,000/vii.Attender charges Rs. 10,000/viii. Loss of future prospects due to partial disability Rs. 40,000/-

¶12

Total Rs.2,01,000/-

¶13

It is the case of injury sustained by a boy aged 7 years old, who is a school student, who suffered 32% disability on account of fracture of bones in his left hand. He has also suffered fracture in the left thigh.

¶14

Learned counsel for the appellant would point out that when the claimant was aged only 7 years and a school student, there is no scope for earnings at Rs.4,500/- per month and that too, for a period of six months and therefore, the compensation awarded under loss of income of Rs.27,000/- is liable to be deducted from the total amount of compensation.

¶15

This contention is well founded and there cannot be any award under the head loss of income for a minor aged about 7 years. There is also a prohibition of a person being employed, when he is below 18 years/14 years. However, learned counsel for the claimant would point out that when a boy aged 7 years sustained injuries, having suffered disability, the cost of attender charges must have been awarded at least at Rs.17,000/and the award of Rs.10,000/- is very low. Therefore, the attender charges is enhanced from Rs.10,000/- to Rs.17,000/-, considering the period of treatment and the nature of injury. But the loss of income awarded is set aside. Therefore, the amount of compensation awarded is Rs.1,81,000/-.

¶16

The next contention is that when the disablement compensation has been awarded, then future prospective income on account of disablement would be a duplicate award. This contention is also correct, but the fact remains that the claimant has not been awarded loss of enjoyment of amenities. Because of the fracture of thigh bone, the claimant who is aged 7 years would be deprived of his childhood pleasure of playing and taking part it trecking and other sports involving skill and adventure. Therefore, the award under future prospects would go

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

to the head of loss of enjoyment of amenities.

¶19

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed reducing the quantum of compensation by Rs.20,000/-. The Appellant/Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire award amount as ordered by this Court along with interest and costs, less the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the award amount in the fixed deposit till the minor claimant attains majority. The interest payable on such deposit shall be paid to the guardian once in three months. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶20

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gya
To
1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Principal District Judge,
Perambalur.
copy to
The Section Officer,
V.R.Section,
High Court,
Madras.
+1 cc to M/s.Royan Law Associates sr 1274
C.M.A.No.437 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
ssi(co)
aa12/12/2017

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Managing Director v. Minor P. Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Managing Director v. Minor P. Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State Express Transport Vs Pushpa

The Managing Director Vs Minor. M. Dhanasekar @

The Branch Manager Vs Thirumalaisamy

M/S.Oriental Insurance Vs Marimuthu

The Managing Direector Vs M. Parthasarathy

Elumalai Vs Ganesh Pillai