K.T.Govindan v. K.P.Anbazagan
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed as not-pressed after petitioner submitted that the dispute was settled and filed a supporting memo without respondent appearance.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed as not-pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.07.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE C.M.A. No.3089 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011
K.T.Govindan ... Petitioner
vs.
1.K.P.Anbazagan
2.Saraswathi
3.Gnanam
4.Vasantha
5.Rani
6.Unnamalai
7.Saravanan
8.D.Venkatachalam ... Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule(s) of
the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the orders of the learned
Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri dated 30.05.2011 in
I.A.No.187 of 2010 in O.S.No.62 of 2010.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Nicholas
For Respondents: No appearance
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for consideration today,
the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
dispute between the parties was settled between themselves and
has also filed a memo to that effect and praying for the
dismissal of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as not-pressed.
2.Recording the above said submission and the memo
filed by the appellant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is
dismissed as not-pressed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rm
To
The Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri.
+1 cc to M/s.Nicholas Advocate sr 51731
C.M.A. No.3089 of 2011
and M.P.No.1 of 2011
mg(co)
aa09/08/2017
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.T.Govindan
- respondent
K.P.Anbazagan
- respondent
Saraswathi
- respondent
Gnanam
- respondent
Vasantha
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court