Mr.G.Sathish Kumar v. J.Surekha
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by default in the absence of the appellant despite the appearance of the respondent's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 10.10.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM
and
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN
C.M.A.No.2887 of 2017
G.Sathish Kumar .. Appellant
Vs
J.Surekha .. Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal preferred under Section 19 of the
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, against the fair and decreetal order
dated 13.03.2017 made in I.A.No.2720 of 2016 in H.M.O.P.No.1844
of 2014 on the file of the Principal Family Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.K.Seetharam
J U D G M E N T
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.SELVAM, J.]
There is no representation on the side of the appellant.
Even on the earlier hearing also, there was no representation on
the side of the appellant. Learned counsel appearing for the
respondent is present and therefore, this Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gya
C.M.A.No.2887 of 2017
To The Principal Family Court, Judge, Chennai.
kgk(co) aa01/11/2017
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal should be dismissed due to the absence of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.Sathish Kumar
- respondent
J.Surekha
Coram
A.Selvam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court