K. Kalaiselvi v. N. Shankar
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellants appealed against an MAC claims award. After joint settlement of parties on compensation quantum, High Court allowed appeal and ordered insurance company to deposit consented amount less what was already paid.
What did the court decide?
Allowed appeal; directed 2nd respondent to deposit consented compensation amount less already paid, with interest and costs, within six weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.03.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
C.M.A.No.2677 of 2015
- K.Kalaiselvi 2. K.Kesavan 3. K.Madhavan
... Appellants
vs.
... Respondents
1.N.Shankar
2.The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.,
New No.216, Old No.115,
Prakasam Salai, Broadway,
Chennai 108.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and decree, dated 15.12.2014 made in M.C.O.P.No.346 of 2013, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (III Judge, Small Causes Court), Chennai.
For Appellant : Mrs.Ramya V. Rao
For 1st Respondent : Mr.K.Thirumavalavan
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellants were entitled to enhanced compensation reaching a consensus on quantum before this Court?
What was the final settled amount of compensation to be deposited by the Insurance Company?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Kalaiselvi
- appellant
K.Kesavan
- appellant
K.Madhavan
- respondent
N.Shankar
- respondent
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court