An appeal filed by three appellants against a decree was dismissed as not pressed because the learned counsel submitted that the parties had settled the matter out of court, evidenced by an endorsement.
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed due to settlement out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Date: 23.01.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
Appeal Suit (MD) No.195 of 2011
1.S.Krisnasamy Gounder 2.K.Loganathan 3.Chithra ... Appellants / Defendants
-Vs-
K.Ashok Kumar ... Respondent / Plaintiff
Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 28.10.2009 made in O.S.No.55 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli.
For Appellants : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.R.Sundar
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the parties have settled the matter out of Court and hence, the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Hence, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
1.The Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Judgment made in Appeal Suit (MD) No.195 of 2011 23.01.2017
JS/CM-MSA/09.01.2017:2P/4C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
1.S.Krisnasamy Gounder 2.K.Loganathan 3.Chithra
K.Ashok Kumar
S.S.Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court