Senbagavalli v. Dhanalakshmi @ Deivanai
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal was withdrawn by the appellant's counsel. The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN
A.S.No.282 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
Senbagavalli ..Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs
1.Dhanalakshmi @ Deivanai
2.Ramu @ Govindasamy
3.Saraswathy
4.Kumuthavally
5.Suguna
6.Pakkiri
7.Magesh @ Maheshwari
8.Srinivasa Perumal ..Respondents/Defendants
Prayer:- This Appeal has been filed under Section 96 and Order
41 Rules 1 & 2 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated
20.01.2011 in O.S.No.9 of 2010 on the file of the learned III
Additional District Judge, Puducherry.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Thiagarajan
For Respondents : Mr.D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
for M/s.Sai Bharath & Ilan
JUDGEMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.Nagamuthu.J)
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the above, this Appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
sd/
Assistant Registrar(CO)
/true copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The III Additional District Judge,
Puducherry.
Copy to
The Section Officer,
V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.Sai, Advocate SR.No.3903
+1cc toi Mr.R.Thiagarajan, Advocate SR.No.4153
A.S.No.282 of 2011
KSJ(CO)
GN(20/02/2017)
Senbagavalli
Dhanalakshmi @ Deivanai
Ramu @ Govindasamy
Saraswathy
Kumuthavally
Suguna
S. Nagamuthu
N. Authinathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court