Allowed

The Official Assignee v. Arjunlal Sunderdas

Madras HC8 Dec 2017APPLN/171/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed an application by the Official Assignee to pass judgment and decree against the insolvent's spouse for a debt due to the insolvent, directing payment of the sum with interest and attaching her property.

What did the court decide?

Judgment and decree against 2nd respondent to pay sum with interest; property attached; restraint on alienation; direction to inform Sub Registrar.

The Official Assignee Vs Arjunlal Sunderdas — Insolvency and Bankruptcy | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(IN INSOLVENCY)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 8th DAY OF DECEMBER 2017

¶5

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

APPLN.NO.171 OF 2017

I.P. No.25 of 2014

APPLN.NO.171 OF 2017

¶13

The Official Assignee, High Court, Madras ... Applicant -VS1.Arjunlal Sunderdas 23,Anderson Road, Nungambakkam Chennai-600 006 ... 1^st Respondent/Insolvent 2.Maya Arjunlal, C/o.Dinesh D.Bajaj, 113, Vardhamal Garden 2^nd Street, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. ... 2^nd Respondent/Third Party/Debtor Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass judgment and decree against the 2^nd respondent to pay a sum of Rs.1,08,10,000/- with interest

¶14

¶15

at 18% p.a. From 01.04.2013 till date of realisation with cost of the recovery proceedings.

¶16

The above application coming on this day before this

¶17

court for hearing in the presence of Mr.K.V.Ananthakrushnan, advocate for the Official

¶18

¶19

The Court made the following order:-

¶20

The application is filed by the Official Assignee seeking a judgment and decree as against the 2^nd respondent. The 1^st respondent is the insolvent, Arjunlal Sunderdas and the 2^nd respondent Mrs. Maya Arjunlal, who is the wife of the 1^st respondent and 3^rd party debtor.

¶21

According to the report of the Official Assignee, categorical statements have been made that on perusal of the statement of accounts furnished by the auditor of the insolvent himself, it has come to light, that the 2^nd respondent is due to sum of Rs.1,08,10,000/- to the insolvent. The Official assignee has also specifically stated that the 2^nd respondent Mrs. Maya Arjunlal owns the property at No. 17, Pantheon Apartments, 34 First Lane, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. During the course

¶22

of the proceedings of the present insolvents, the Official Assignee has also taken effective possession of the

¶23

¶24

property. Notice had been directed in the application to both the respondents. The first respondent is represented by counsel, who has not come forward to state any objections or has preferred to file any counter. The name of the 2^nd respondent is printed in the cause list. She has decided not to participate in the proceedings and she has not appeared either in person or through counsel. She is set exparte. The counsel for the 1^st respondent has admitted that 2^nd respondent is the spouse of the 1^st respondent.

¶25

In view of the fact that there are a number of creditors, who have to be satisfied and the estate of the insolvents is to be utilised for such purpose, this property, which is today in custody of the Official Assignee, may be utilised for such purpose, as sought by K.V. Anantha Krishnan the learned counsel representing the Official Assignee. There shall be a judgment and decree under sections 7, 36, 68 and 90 of Insolvency Act as against the 2^nd respondent to direct the 2^nd respondent to pay a sum of Rs.1,08,10,000/- together with interest 18% from 01.04.2013 till date of realization.

¶26

In view of the fact the order of the judgment and decree has been passed as against the 2^nd respondent as stated above and taking into account the fact that the 2^nd respondent, though she had received notice, thought it fit not to appear and participate in the Judicial proceedings, to ensure that the fruits of the said order are realised, there shall be an order of attachment, restraining the 2^nd

¶27

¶28

respondent from in any manner, dealing with or alienating or encumbering the property at No. 17, Pantheon Apartments, 34 First Lane, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008 until further order.

¶29

The Official Assignee is directed to address the

¶30

Sub Registrar office, within whose jurisdiction the property is situated, informing that there is an order of attachment passed against the said property and also informing that no encumbrance shall be registered with respect to the said property. Since there is an order of attachment, a decree was also passed over the said property. This application is allowed on the above terms.

¶31

WITNESS, THE HON'BLE MS. INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT AT MADRAS, AFORESAID THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017.

SD/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Original Side – I

//CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE COPY//

¶36

DATED THIS THE DAY OF 2017

¶37

MANAGER

¶38

INSOLVENCY OFFICE

¶39

From 25^th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

cns-12.12.2017

HIGH COURT, MADRAS

APPLN. No.171 OF 2017

¶44

¶45

I.P.NO.25 of 2014

¶46

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶47

AND

¶48

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶49

ORDER DATED: 08.12.2017

¶50

FOR APPROVAL: 13/12/2017 02/01/2018

¶51

APPROVED ON : 03/01/2018

¶52

COPY TO:-

¶53

THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶54

¶55

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶56

(IN INSOLVENCY)

¶57

FRIDAY, THE 8th DAY OF DECEMBER 2017

¶58

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶59

AND

¶60

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

APPLN.NO.171 OF 2017

I.P. No.25 of 2014

In the matter of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, III of 1909 and In the matter of Arjunlal Sunderdas ...Debtor I.P.NO.25 OF 2014 Smt.Chitra Desai residing at 3A-302, Oakland Park, Yamuna Nagar, Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri (West), Mumbai. ... Petitioning Creditor -VSMr.Arjunlal Sunderdas 23, Anderson Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006. ... Respondent / Debtor APPLN.NO.171 OF 2017 The Official Assignee, High Court, Madras ... Applicant -VS1.Arjunlal Sunderdas 23,Anderson Road, Nungambakkam Chennai-600 006 ... 1^st Respondent/Insolvent 2.Maya Arjunlal, C/o.Dinesh D.Bajaj, 113, Vardhamal Garden 2^nd Street, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. ... 2^nd Respondent/Third Party/Debtor Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass judgment and decree against the 2^nd respondent to pay a sum of Rs.1,08,10,000/- with interest

¶65

APPLN.NO.171 OF 2017

¶66

¶67

at 18% p.a. From 01.04.2013 till date of realisation with cost of the recovery proceedings.

¶68

The above application coming on this day before this

¶69

court for hearing in the presence of Mr.K.V.Ananthakrushnan, advocate for the Official

¶70

Assignee, the applicant herein and Ms.J.Bamini, advocate for the 1^st respondent/insolvent and the 2^nd respondent not appearing in person or by advocate and set exparte herein, and upon reading the Judges Summon and report of the Official Assignee filed herein,, and this Court having observed that in view of the fact the order of the judgment and decree has been passed as against the 2^nd respondent as stated above and taking into account the fact that the 2^nd respondent, though she had received notice, though it fit not to appear and participate in the Judicial proceedings, to ensure that the fruits of the said order are realised,

¶71

IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS :-

¶72

(I)That the 2^nd respondent herein do pay a sum of Rs.1,99,27,716.71 (Rupees One crore ninety nine lakhs twenty seven thousand seven hundred sixteen and paise seventy one only) from the date till the date of realisation.

¶73

(ii)That the immovable property morefully setout in the schedule hereunder be and is hereby attached and the same do remain under attachment until further orders of this Court.

¶74

(iii)That Maya Arjunlal, the 2^nd respondent herein

¶75

¶76

be and is hereby restrained until further orders of this Court from in any manner, dealing with or alienating or encumbering the property at No.17, Pantheon Apartments, 34 First Lane, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

¶77

(iv)That the Official Assignee herein be and is hereby directed to address the Sub Registrar Office, within whose jurisdiction the property is situated, informing that there is an order of attachment passed against the said property and also informing that no encumbrance shall be registered with respect to the said property.

¶78

SCHEDULE

¶79

The property at No.17, Pantheon Apartments, 34 First Lane, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

¶80

WITNESS, THE HON'BLE MS. INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT AT MADRAS, AFORESAID THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017.

SD/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Original Side – I

//CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE COPY// DATED THIS THE DAY OF 2017

¶85

MANAGER

¶86

INSOLVENCY OFFICE From 25^th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

cns-12.12.2017

HIGH COURT, MADRAS

APPLN. No.171 OF 2017

¶91

¶92

I.P.NO.25 of 2014

¶93

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶94

AND

¶95

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶96

ORDER DATED: 08.12.2017

¶97

FOR APPROVAL: 13/12/2017 02/01/2018 APPROVED ON : 03/01/2018

¶98

COPY TO:-

¶99

THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

The Official Assignee v. Arjunlal Sunderdas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Official Assignee v. Arjunlal Sunderdas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Chitra Desai Vs Mr.Arjulal Sunderdas

Dr.M.Arumugam Vs the Official Assignee

The Official Assignee Vs S. Arjunlal Sunderdas

The Official Assignee Vs S. Arjunlal Sunderdas