V.Anandan v. v.Indumathi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras allowed an application by plaintiffs to amend the plaint. The court held that the amendment, intended to add allegations against newly impleaded defendants in possession of the property, was consequential and did not alter the suit's nature or cause of action.
What did the court decide?
Allowed application to amend plaint; counsel directed to file amended plaint and serve copies by 28.02.2017.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) THURSDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
A.No.785 of 2017
in
C.S. No.467 of 2011
- 1.Mr.V.Anandan,
S/o Varadhan
2.A.Gnanamaheswari @ A.Maheswari, W/o V.Anandan, Both are residing at No.12/7, 9th Street, Rajashanmugam Nagar, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai 19 ... Plaintiffs/Applicants
Vs.
1.V.Indumathi,
Door No.29/1, Veera Kutty Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 21.
- 2.Mallika,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application to amend the plaint to include consequential allegations against newly impleaded defendants changes the nature of the suit.
Whether the proposed amendment will prejudice the defendants.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mr. V. Anandan & Ors.
- respondent
V. Indumathi & Ors.
Coram
N. Sathish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court