Muniyammal v. Valli Ammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras issued a supplementary preliminary decree declaring the applicant, the 4th defendant, entitled to an 1/8th share in both items of the suit property, despite her ex-parte status in the original trial.
What did the court decide?
Directing that the 4th defendant be declared entitled to 1/8th share in Item No.1 and Item No.2 of the suit properties.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
A. No.444 of 2017 in C.S. No.165 of 2008
- Mrs.Valli Ammal
- Mrs.Kasiammal 1 & 2 are at No.82, Vaikundapuram, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034
- Mrs.Saradha No.52, Kasarajapuram Extn., Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 ... Plaintiffs -Versus-
- Mrs.Ellammal
- Mr.Venkatesan 1 & 2 are at No.18/1, Scheme Road, Mahalingapuram, Chennai -34
- Mr.Janakiraman No.82, Vaikundapuram, Nungambakkam, Chennai –34
- Mrs.Muniyammal Yadava Street, Kuzhipauthandalam & P.O., Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a supplementary preliminary decree is required to declare the share of a defendant who remained ex-parte and did not pay separate court fee during the trial.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mrs.Muniyammal Yadava Street
- respondent
Mrs.Valli Ammal
- respondent
Mrs.Kasiammal
- respondent
Mrs.Saradha
- respondent
Mrs.Ellammal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court