The Single Judge, after noting that respondents failed to furnish security following a prior order, directed that properties be attached and closed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPLICATION No.3617 of 2014
S.VIMALA, J.,
The applicant has filed this application seeking direction to the sole respondent, namely, M.Vediyappan, to furnish security to the tune of Rs.6,69,666.70.
Application is closed.
26.04.2017
Office to Note :
To communicate this order to the SubRegistrar/s concerned and respondent, by RPAD.
Gv/ogy
S.Vimala
M.Vediyappan
S.Vimala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
