Mr.D.Ravi v. D.L.Ravi
Case brief
What is this about?
In a suit for partition involving multiple defendants, the court disposed of two applications filed by the 16th defendant. One sought to set aside an ex-parte order, while the other prayed for condonation of delay in filing the written statement. The court allowed both applications.
What did the court decide?
Ex-parte order dated 14.02.2017 set aside and delay in filing written statement condoned.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2017 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN A.No.3306 AND 3307 of 2017 in C.S.No.44 of 2013
C.S.NO.44 OF 2013
1.D.L.Ravi, S/o. Lakshmi Narayanan, residin at Old No.18, New No.6, Salam Apartments, Thomas Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. ...Plaintiff -Vs-
1.Mr.J.Kalyaperumal, S/o.Late Jayaram Chettiar, No.63, Mada Koil Street, Aryankuppam, Puducherry,
2.Mrs.K.Revathi, W/o.late Nadarajan @ Kandavelu, No.24/89, 3rd Cross, Karpagam Avenue, R.A.Puram, Chennai-28.
3.Mrs.R.sathya, W/o.late Nadarajan @ Kandavelu, No.24/89, 3rd Cross, Karpagam Avenue, R.A.Puram, Chennai-28. 4.Mr.K.Balamurali, W/o.late Nadarajan @ Kandavelu, No.24/89, 3rd Cross, Karpagam Avenue, R.A.Puram, Chennai-28.
2
5.Mr.J.Ganesan @ Vinayagamurthy, S/o.Late Jayaram Chettiar No.16, 5th Cross Street, Rajaji Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry.
6.J.Jayakumar, S/o.Late Jayaram Chettiar No.6, 3th Cross Street, Rajaji Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ex-parte order against the 16th defendant should be set aside.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.L. Ravi
- respondent
1. Mr. J. Kalyaperumal
- respondent
2. Mrs. K. Revathi
- respondent
3. Mrs. R. Sathya
- respondent
4. Mr. K. Balamurali
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court