The court closed Application No. 313 of 2017 due to the non-appearance of the respondent. The applicant confirmed receipt of the seized vehicle and concluded arbitration proceedings, leaving the application pending no further pronouncement.
Application stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.313 of 2017
DR.ANITA SUMANTH,J.
By order, dated 20.01.2017, this Court appointed Mr.Umasankar Pattanik, Branch Manager of the applicant company, as a Receiver, to seize and possess the vehicle in question.
cause list, none appears on his behalf.
2
DR.ANITA SUMANTH,J.
vsm
the same stands closed. The parties are free to take such action, as they may desire hereafter, in accordance with law.
vsm
05.06.2017
Application No.313 of 2017
Applicant Company
Respondent
Dr Anita Sumanth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
