Vinothin v. S.kasi
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order allowing application to file additional documents subject to proof and relevancy and listing the suit for evidence recording.
What did the court decide?
Application allowed to file documents subject to proof and relevancy; suit listed for evidence.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION)
THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
A.No.272 of 2017 in T.O.S.No.17 of 2011
In the matter of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 and In the matter of the Last will and Testament of Late Sethu Madhavan Nair.
T.O.S.NO.17 OF 2011:
S.Kasi, S/o.V.Shanmugham, No.121, Lingi chetty Street, 3rd Floor, Chennai-600 001.
...Plaintiff/Plaintiff
-Vs-
Vinothin, S/o Gnanathukunnam Vimala Amma, Kadamana Thiruvendidam, Guruvayoor, Kerala State.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Kasi
- respondent
Vinothin
Coram
N.Sathish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court