4.In the circumstances, it appears that the petitioner has given a representation on 05.07.2011, for the grant of patta, after enclosing a copy of the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.139 of 2009. Since the third respondent did not pass any order on the petitioner's representation, the petitioner gave another representation to the second respondent, on 16.08.2011, which has been forwarded to the third respondent. Since the two representations of the petitioner was not considered, subsequently, he filed a writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.8817 of 2012, before this Court, seeking a direction to the third respondent to consider her representations. This Court has allowed the writ petition, by order dated 29.06.2012, with a direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.08.2011. Even thereafter, the third respondent did not pass any order. But, after issuance of the contempt notice by the petitioner's counsel on 16.10.2012, the petitioner received the impugned order on 01.11.2012, which was passed by the third respondent on 28.09.2012, rejecting the petitioner's representation dated 16.08.2011, without even adverting to the judgment and decree of the trial court, passed in O.S.No.139 of 2009.
