Allowed

M.Pavalakkodi v. the Director of Survey and

Madras HC29 Jul 2016WP(MD)/7360/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the Director of Survey and Settlement to dispose of a petitioner's representation regarding the mutation of patta within six weeks. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

Direct the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 29.06.2013 on merit within six weeks.

M.Pavalakkodi Vs the Director of Survey and — Madras HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED 29.07.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.7360 OF 2014

¶7

M.Pavalakkodi ..Petitioner

¶8

.-Vs-.

¶9

The Director of Survey & Settlement, Directorate, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. ..Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 29.06.2013 on merit and in accordance with law, within a reasonable time that may be stipulated by this Court as this Court may deem fit and proper.

¶11

For Petitioner :Mr.K.Appadurai

¶12

For Respondent :Mr.Aayiram K Selvakumar Govt.Advocate.

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent herein to dispose of his representation dated 29.06.2013.

¶15

2.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has given a representation on 29.06.2013, regarding the mutation of patta in the name of the petitioner. It is also submitted by the petitioner that in a civil proceedings which is ended in her favour in S.A.No.743 of 1992 by a judgment dated 09.09.1996.

¶16

In that view of the matter, this Court is inclined to allow the writ petition by directing the respondent to consider the the petitioner's representation dated 29.06.2013 and dispose of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

¶18

With the above directions, this writ petition is allowed.

¶19

No costs.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶22

/True copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

The Director of Survey & Settlement, Directorate,

¶26

Chepauk,

¶27

Chennai-600 005.

¶28

+1cc to Mr.K.Appadurai, Advocate Sr.No.40692

¶29

gsr

¶30

sm:KBM:SAR III:10.08.2016:2P/3C

¶31

W.P(MD)No.7360 OF 2014

¶32

29.07.2016 1/2

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Pavalakkodi v. the Director of Survey and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Pavalakkodi v. the Director of Survey and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T. Sangapillai Vs the Government of India

Ramachandran Vs the Commissioner of Police

K.N. Mani, Vs the District Registrar

Minor.M. Shafiya Begam Vs the Director of Postal

M. Pavalakkodi, Vs the Superintendent of Police

M.Murugan, Vs the District Collector