Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a community certificate for his son. The court directed the respondent to consider the pending representation and pass orders within eight weeks, disposing of the petition.
Writ petition dismissed; direction given to respondent to consider the petition's pending representation and pass orders within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.01.2016 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN
Writ Petition (MD) No.449 of 2016
Mariappan ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Revenue Tahsildar, Alangulam Taluk Office, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondent
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.08.2015 and consequently direct the respondent to issue community certificate to the petitioner's son namely M.Gnanasekar as Hindu Kadaiyan as per Entry No.26 of schedule caste list within the time limit that may be stipulated by this court.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.D.Ganeshmoorthi For Respondent : Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian, Special Government Pleader.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J. )
The petitioner contends that he belongs to Hindu Kadaiyan community which is classified as scheduled caste community. The petitioner's son is studying 11th standard in Punitha Arulappar Higher Secondary School, Avadayanoor, Tirunelveli District. He further contends that since the community certificate is essential to join higher studies, he sent a representation on 13.08.2015. In spite of the receipt of the said representation, neither the said representation has been disposed of nor community certificate has been issued. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing this writ petition.
2.Heard Mr.A.D.Ganeshamoorthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent.
3.Taking into consideration the petitioner also given representation on 13.08.2015 seeking community certificate for his https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ son based on the community certificate issued to him, it is appropriate to direct the respondent to consider the said representation and pass appropriate orders on merits and in
2
accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-I)
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Revenue Tahsildar,Alangulam Taluk Office,Tirunelveli District.
+one cc to M/s.A.D.Ganeshmoorthi, Advocate in SR.No.1970
Writ Petition (MD) No.449 of 2016
08.01.2016
CSL/SKS-RR/04.02.2016/2p/3c
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent authority is directed to issue a community certificate to the petitioner's son as per the petitioner's representation filed earlier.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mariappan
The Revenue Tahsildar
N.KIRUBAKARAN
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court