Disposed

J. Joseph Amaladoss, v. the Registrar

Madras HC2 Nov 2016WP(MD)/4144/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court did not decide the merits of the petitioner's claim for earned leave salary. Instead, it directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.12.2010 on merits and pass appropriate orders within three weeks, thereby disposing of the petition without costs. No legal principles were laid down.

What did the court decide?

Director to third respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 20.12.2010 on merits and pass orders within three weeks.

J. Joseph Amaladoss, Vs the Registrar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 02.11.2016

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN

¶6

Writ Petition(MD)No.4144 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011

¶7

J.Joseph Amaladoss, Manager (Retired), Central Co-operative Bank, Dindigul, residing at No.1/663, Dr.Govindaraj Nagar, Dindigul 624 005.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs .

¶10

The Registrar, Co-operative Societies Limited, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.

¶11

The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Dindigul 624 001.

¶12

The Special Officer (Administration), Dindigul Central Co-opeative Bank Limited, Dindigul 624 005.

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to disburse the withheld sum of Rs.93,684/- towards earned leave salary payable on the retirement of the petitioner together with interest.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vijayakumar For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Guru Additional Govt. Pleader For R3 : Mr.D.Shanmuga Raja Sethupathi

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The writ petition has been filed for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to disburse the withheld sum of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Rs.93,684/- towards earned leave salary payable on the retirement of the petitioner together with interest.

¶18

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.

¶20

Though the writ petition is filed for the larger relief,

¶21

the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner will be met out, if the representation given by the petitioner on 20.12.2010 to the third respondent is considered on merits.

¶22

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 20.12.2010 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶24

Sd/

¶25

Assistant Registrar(A.E.,)

¶26

/TRUE COPY/

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

The Registrar, Co-operative Societies Limited, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.

¶30

The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Dindigul 624 001.

¶31

The Special Officer (Administration), Dindigul Central Co-opeative Bank Limited, Dindigul 624 005.

¶32

+1cc to M/s.R.Vijayakumar, Advocate, in SR No.65344.

¶33

+1cc to M/s.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi, Advocate, in SR No.65387.

¶34

+1cc to Special Government Pleader in SR.No.65304.

¶35

W.P(MD)No.4144 of 2011

¶36

02.11.2016

¶37

akv

¶38

msm-ss3/sar3/02.01.17/p2/7c

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J. Joseph Amaladoss, v. the Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J. Joseph Amaladoss, v. the Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Sengottaiyan, Vs Shanmughavadivu

Gunasekaran Vs Elangovan

C.Jayanthi, Vs the Tamil Nadu State Transport

S.Sabitha, Vs the Chairman, the Teachers -

R. Celin Rajakkannu, Vs the Joint Commissioner of

M.R. Syed Ibrahim, Vs the District Revenue Officer