Dismissed

J.Renuga, W/O.Murugesan v. the President

Madras HC24 Feb 2016WP(MD)/3864/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the suspension of the petitioner as Secretary of a cooperative society. The court relied on a communication stating the impugned order lacked the society's seal and the President's signature, rendering it unenforceable.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner may challenge any future orders affecting her office in the manner known to law.

J.Renuga, W/O.Murugesan Vs the President — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Writ Petition (MD) No.3864 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.3465 of 2016

¶5

J.Renuga ...Petitioner Vs.

¶6

The President, Y.P.676, Pudukottai District Noon Meal Workers, Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. ...Respondent

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent dated Nil and quash the same as illegal and in violation of provisions of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act 1983.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mathavan For Respondents : Mr.M.Murugan, Government Advocate.

¶9

ORDER

¶10

Challenging the order suspending the petitioner from acting as a Secretary of the society, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition.

¶11

2.At the time of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner produced a communication dated 23.02.2016 sent by the Deputy Registrar, Pudukottai to the President (in charge), Pudukottai District Noon Meal Workers, Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District stating that the impugned order does not even contain seal of the society and also the signature of the President.

¶12

3.The said communication very clearly states that the impugned order is unenforceable. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. If the petitioner is so aggrieved by any other order that may be passed by the President of Society affecting the office of the petitioner, it is open to her to challenge the same in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P(MD)No.3465 of 2016 is closed.

¶13

Sd/-

¶14

Assistant Registrar(CO)I/C

¶15

/True Copy/

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai-23.

¶18

¶19

¶20

1 The President, Y.P.676, Pudukottai District Noon Meal Workers, Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society,Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.

¶21

2 The Deputy Registrar, Pudukottai to the President (in charge), Pudukottai District Noon Meal Workers, Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.

¶22

+1cc to M/s.G.Mathavan, Advocate in SR.10571

¶23

+1cc to the Special Government Pleader, in SR.10990

¶24

Writ Petition (MD) No.3864 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.3465 of 2016 24.02.2016

¶25

sms

¶26

PBK/NGM-SS/AR-I 29/02/2016 ::2P-5C::

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J.Renuga, W/O.Murugesan v. the President

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Renuga, W/O.Murugesan v. the President

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Govindarajan Vs the Joint Director of Shcool

Sudhakar Vs the District Collector

K.Karmegam, S/O.M.Karuppaiah Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

K.Jeyalakshmi, Vs the Commissioner

C.Sethu Ramalingam Vs the Managing Director

R.S. Rajendran Vs the Management of