Disposed

M.Chakaravarthy v. the District Revenue Officer

Madras HC17 Feb 2016WP(MD)/3418/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismissed a writ petition under Article 226. The court directed the District Revenue Officer to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.07.2015 regarding error in UDR scheme entries within four months, after providing notice to parties.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed of; directions issued to consider representation dated 07.07.2015 within four months after notice to parties.

M.Chakaravarthy Vs the District Revenue Officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 17.02.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURBLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶6

W.P(MD).No.3418 of 2016

M.Chakaravarthy

... Petitioner

Vs.

The District Revenue Officer, O/o. The District Revenue Officer, Korampallam, Tuticorin District.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to rectify the wrong entries made under UDR scheme in respect of S.No.45/7, Thannoothu Village, Srivaigundam Taluk, Tuticorin District by considering the representation dated 07.07.2015.

¶13

For petitioner : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha For Respondent : Mr.S.Kumar Additional Govt. Pleader

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

The writ petition has been filed for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to rectify the wrong entries made under UDR scheme in respect of S.No.45/7, Thannoothu Village, Srivaigundam Taluk, Tuticorin District, by considering the representation dated 07.07.2015.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice if the representation of the petitioner is disposed of, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶17

In view of the limited scope of the prayer, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.07.2015 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the parties, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

¶19

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶20

Sd/ Assistant Registrar (P&A)

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

akv To

¶24

The District Revenue Officer, O/o. The District Revenue Officer, Korampallam,

¶25

Tuticorin District.

¶26

+1cc to government Pleader in SR.No.9592 +1cc to Mr.N.Mohideen Basha, Advocate SR.No.9261

¶27

CN/MPA/29.2.2016/4c-2p

¶28

W.P(MD).No.3418 of 2016 17.02.2016

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Chakaravarthy v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Chakaravarthy v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Palani Vs the District Collector

R. Muthu Vs the District Collector

T.Chokkalingam, Vs the Deputy Commercial Tax

S.Venkatesan Vs the Superintendent Engineer

P.G.Ayyadurai, S/O. Late. Vs the Commissioner

P.Krishna Moorthy Vs the District Collector