Writ petition challenging a final notice issued by a bank was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or submit representations during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 25.02.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P.(MD)No.3385 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.2980 and 2981 of 2016
M.Maruthamuthu ... Petitioner
Vs.
Trichy District, Trichy.
Trichy District. ... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari challenging the final notice issued by the second respondent in message ID 78550-143556-15, dated 10.02.2016 and quash the same as unconstitutional.
For Petitioner : No appearance. For R1 : Mr.S.Kumar Addl. Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.Pala Ramasamy
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 23.02.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was posted on 25.02.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AE)
/True Copy/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
Akv AA/SKS-RR/21.03.2016/2p-3c
W.P.(MD)No.3385 of 2016 25.02.2016
M. Maruthamuthu
The District Collector, Trichy District
The Branch Manager, State Bank of India
B. Rajendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
