“2.1.It is the further case of the petitioner that as per the settled law, the Registrar should register the documents if the same is properly produced before the Sub-Registrar concerned. But, in the case on hand, the Sub-Registrar refused to register the document by referring the communication of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, dated 27.08.2013 stating that the document should not be registered without obtaining 'No Objection Certificate' from him. The further case of the petitioner is that on 12.04.2013, a sale deed No.1700/2014 was registered by the same Sub-Registrar. In this regard, it has been further contended that when the same objection was raised by the Tahsildar for registration of document of one Saravana Kumar, the said Saravana Kumar had filed an original suit in O.S.No.397 of 2013, on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif Court, Tuticorin. The said suit ended in favour of the said Saravanakumar. As against the said suit, no appeal was filed by the respondents therein. However, the document presented by the said Saravana Kumar was not registered by the respondents therein. Therefore, he approached this Court by way of a writ petition in W.P. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (MD).No.13583 of 2015. This Court, by an order dated 31.07.2015, made in W.P.(MD).NO.13583 of 2015 directed the respondents therein to register the document.
