Disposed

M.Perumal, v. the District Collector

Madras HC11 Nov 2016WP(MD)/21138/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, on a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct revenue authorities to issue a joint patta for specific lands, directed the Tahsildar to consider the pending representation and pass appropriate orders on merits within twelve weeks after notifying interested parties.

What did the court decide?

Directed the third respondent (Tahsildar) to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders on merits within twelve weeks.

M.Perumal, Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.11.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Writ Petition (MD) No.21138 of 2015

¶6

M.Perumal 1.The District Collector, Trichy.

¶7

Vs.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.

¶10

3.The Tahsildar, Turaiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

¶11

4.K.Ravichandran 5.M.Murugesan 6.Thangammal (R4 to R6 impleaded as per order dated 07.12.2015 made in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015)

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to make necessary enquiry to issue joint patta in respect of the lands in S.No.449/3B 458/2A 444/1C and 444/1D situated at Sirunavalur, Turaiyur Taluk, Trichy District based on the petitioner's representation dated 7.11.2015.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohan For Respondents 1-3 : Mr.R.Anandaraj, Government Advocate. For Respondents 4-6 : No appearance

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to make necessary enquiry and to issue joint patta in respect of the lands in S.No.449/3B, 458/2A 444/1C and 444/1D situated at Sirunavalur, Turaiyur Taluk, Trichy District based on the petitioner's representation dated 7.11.2015.

¶17

2.Heard Mr.N.Mohan, learned counsel appearing for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner and Mr.R.Anandaraj, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.

¶18

¶19

3.The petitioner said to have submitted a representation before the Tahsildar, dated 07.11.2015 to issue joint patta including the respondents 4 to 6 who are the legal heirs of the petitioner's brother which is still pending.

¶20

4.In the above circumstances, without going into the merits of the case, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.11.2015 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice to the petitioner as well as to the respondents 4 to 6.

¶21

5.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar (AE) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Trichy. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District. 3.The Tahsildar, Turaiyur Taluk, Trichy District. +1 CC to Mr.N.MOHAN, Advocate, SR No.68479 +1 CC to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR No.68308 Writ Petition (MD) No.21138 of 2015 11.11.2016 sms SH/PV:25.11.2016:2P/6C

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Perumal, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Perumal, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Udaiyachi, Vs the District Collector

S. Chinnadurai, Vs the Union of India

D. Balamurugan, Vs Sriram General Insurance

Ayyankannu, Vs the District Collector

V.Pichai Ambalam, Vs the District Collector

B. Venkatesan, Vs the District Collector