Petitioner challenging a writ of certiorari to quash an order directing him to remove an unauthorized shed constructed behind an Aavin Milk Booth. Court rejected the petitioner's claim of permission for the shed.
Writ Petition dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petition dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.11.2016
CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
W.P.[MD].No.21007 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD)No.15015 of 2016
T.Murugan : Petitioner
Vs.
Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District. : Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.Aa3/5012/2011, dated 26.10.2016, quash the same and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Thesigan For Respondents : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, Government Advocate
O R D E R
***************
[Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.]
The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition challenging the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.Aa3/5012/2011, dated 26.10.2016, wherein the second respondent has directed the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner to remove the unauthorized shed put up by him just behind the Aavin Milk Booth in Kamarajar Bus Stand at Kulasekarapatti in Keelapavoor Panchayat Union Limits.
2
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (Writ)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
SML
TE/SS-2 : 11/11/2016 : 2P/6C Order made in
W.P.[MD].No.21007 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD)No.15015 of 2016
Dated: 02.11.2016
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was authorized to construct a shed for an Aavin Milk Booth.
Whether the direction to remove the unauthorized shed was illegal.
Whether the Writ Petition challenging the removal order should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T. Murugan
The District Collector, Tirunelveli District
The Block Development Officer, Keelapavoor Panchayat Union
Kulasekarapatti Panchayat
S. Nagamuthu
M. V. Muralidaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
