Disposed

M.Ayyakannu v. the District Collector

Madras HC20 Dec 2016WP(MD)/19218/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition invoking Article 226 of the Constitution. It directed the District Collector, Tahsildar, and Firka Surveyor to measure the petitioner's land and pass orders on merits within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 2 and 3 directed to consider the petitioner's request for land measurement and pass orders within twelve weeks.

M.Ayyakannu Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED 20.12.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶6

W.P(MD)No. 19218 of 2016

¶7

M. Ayyakannu ... Petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai – 625 020 2.The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk, Othakadai, Madurai – 625 107 3.The Firka Surveyor, Othakadai Firka, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai – 625 107. ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 24.08.2016, to measure the land in Survey No. 13/8B of Mangalakudi Village under Othakadai Firka of Madurai East Taluk within the time as stipulated by this Court.

¶11

For petitioner : Mr. N. Tamil Mani For respondents : Mr. T. S. Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioner seeks for survey of land at Survey No. 13/8B of Mangalakudi Village under Othakadai Firka of Madurai East Taluk.

¶14

2.It is seen that the petitioner has made several https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ representations. Out of which, last one was made on 24.08.2016 seeking for the very same relief. Therefore, it is for the

¶15

¶16

concerned officials, namely, the second and third respondents to consider such request of the petitioner and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law also after hearing the rival claimants, if any. Such exercise shall be done by the respondents 2 and 3 within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

3.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector Madurai District Madurai – 625 020 2.The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk, Othakadai, Madurai – 625 107 3.The Firka Surveyor, Othakadai Firka, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai – 625 107. +1 cc M/S N. TAMILMANI, Advocate, SR. No:82766 +1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR. No: 82316 skn GJM/SS2/KSM/12.01.2017/2p/6c W.P(MD)No. 19218 of 2016 20.12.2016

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Ayyakannu v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ayyakannu v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T. Nesamani Vs the Zonal Manager

R. Susila Vs the Sub Registrar

H.Bonifas, Vs the Deputy Director

A.Ambi, S/O.Adaikkan Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Sozhiya Vellalar Uravinmurai, Vs the Commissioenr

R. Kannammal Vs the State of Tamil Nadu