Single-line order noting the impleading application of Sankaralingam in a pending writ petition regarding town planning approval. Court directed posting before the judge who dismissed the main petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of November Two Thousand Sixteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN
WP(MD) No.16520 of 2015 and Mp(MD)No.1 of 2015 and WMP(MD)No.216 of 2016
M.BABY ... PETITIONER
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, THOOTHUKUDI.
2 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRIVAIKUNDAM SELECTION GRADE TOWN PANCHAYAT, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Na. Ka. No.370/2015 dated 20.08.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further directing the 2nd respondent to accept the petitioner s application dated 27.07.2015 in respect of the property in Survey No.53/4A, Ward No.10, Saraswathi Amman Kovil Street, Srivaikundam Town Panchayat, Thoothukudi District and to approve the petitioner s building plan.
ORDER : This Writ Petition coming on for Being Mentioned. Upon Perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support there of the order of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.R.Maheswaran, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Mr.V.Rajiv Rufus Advocate for the implead Respondent the Court made the following order :-
This matter is posted today under the Caption “for being Mentioned” at the instance of the learned Counsel appearing for the impleading Respondent.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the proposed respondent that the Writ Petition has been filed challenging the
Order passed by the Second respondent dated 20.08.2015, and this Court (Hon'ble Mr.Justice B.RAJENDRAN) by an order, dated 26.04.2016, dismissed the Writ Petition. At the time of dismissal of this Writ Petition, the impleading petition filed by the proposed respondent was not ordered, even though the arguments of the learned counsel for the proposed respondent was heard. Hence the matter is posted today “ for being mentioned and to pass orders in the impleading application.
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO
+1. C.C. to Mr.V.Rajiv Rufus Advocate SR.No.15460 GJM/RSK/SAR-3-22.3.17-2p-2C
Order Date :16/11/2016 CD PURPOSE WP(MD) No.16520 of 2015 and Mp(MD)No.1 of 2015 and WMP(MD)No.216 of 2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. BABY
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THOOTHUKUDI
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRIVAIKUNDAM SELECTION GRADE TOWN PANCHAYAT
SANKARALINGAM
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
