A. Kanimozhi, v. the Superintendent
Case brief
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.02.2016 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P.(MD)No.14823 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011
A.Kanimozhi ... Petitioner Vs.
The Superintendent, Central Prison, Tiruchirapalli. ... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to take appropriate measures for ensuring the physical safety and well being of A.Shanmugam brother of the petitioner detained in Central Prison, Tiruchirapalli.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth For Respondent : Mr.M.Rajarajan Govt. Advocate
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorse ment to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AE)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
akv To
The Superintendent,Central Prison,Tiruchirapalli.
+one cc to M/s.B.Prasanna Vinoth, Advocate in SR.No.8687 +one cc to The Special Government Pleader in SR.No. 8586
CSL/SKS-RR/23.02.2016/1p/4c
W.P.(MD)No.14823 of 2011 11.02.2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Kanimozhi
The Superintendent, Central Prison, Tiruchirapalli
B. Rajendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court