Disposed

Mariappan, S/O.Sudalaimuthu v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC27 Jun 2016WP(MD)/10871/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of an appeal regarding a Community Certificate for the petitioner's son within two months, citing the petitioner's student status and its impact on academic career.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to deal with the appeal on merits and pass appropriate orders within two months.

Mariappan, S/O.Sudalaimuthu Vs the Revenue… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 27.06.2016

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.10871 of 2016

Mariappan

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.

¶11

The Revenue Tahsildar, Alangulam Taluk Office, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to dispose his appeal dated 23.04.2016, to set aside the order of the second respondent made in Na.Ka.A7/13008/2015, dated 12.04.2016 and issue Community Certificate to the petitioner's son, namely, M.Gnanasekar as Hindu 'Kadaiyan' as per Entry No.26 of Schedule Caste list within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court in the circumstances of the case.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.A.D.Ganeshamoorthi For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan, Special Government Pleader

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(Order of the Court was made by NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO,J.)

¶16

The petitioner has claimed a Community Certificate, but however, that was rejected by the Tahsildar, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli District, by his order dated 12.04.2016. It appears that an appeal has been preferred there against to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District, on 23.04.2016. Complaining that the said appeal has not been taken up so far, the present writ petition is filed.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

In normal circumstances, we would not entertain this writ petition, which is moved in such a quick time after 23.04.2016, but

¶19

¶20

for the fact that the petitioner is a student and therefore, grant or refusal to grant the Community Certificate will have some bearing upon his academic career. Therefore, keeping that alone in mind, we direct the first respondent – Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District, to deal with the appeal of the writ petitioner on merits and strictly in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders by assigning reasons for his conclusion, as early as possible, preferrable within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of as above, after hearing the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Revenue Tahsildar, Alangulam Taluk Office, Tirunelveli District. + 1 CC TO MR.A.D.GANESHAMOORTHI, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 33408 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 33548

¶27

RSB

¶28

TE/AAL-MPA/ : 06/07/2016 : 2P/5C

¶29

W.P(MD)No.10871 of 2016 27.06.2016

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mariappan, S/O.Sudalaimuthu v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mariappan, S/O.Sudalaimuthu v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kannan(Died) Vs the Divisional Manager

G.v.Vairamsanthosh, Vs the Registrar

Vs P.Senguttuarasan

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Michel George

R.Sivashanmugasundaram Vs the District Revenue Officer

M/S.National Insurance Company Vs Rajeswari