Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Collector to dispose of representations. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn based on counsel's endorsement.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.01.2016
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN
Writ Petition (MD) No.1079 of 2016
R.Kannan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Tahsildar, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Perunazhi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
4.Vel @ Veerapathiran
5.Vellaisamy ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 15.6.2015 and 23.9.2015 according to law within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.U.Maheswari
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J. )
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(T & P)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
Sms
AA/AAL-MPA/09.02.2016/2p-4c
Writ Petition (MD) No.1079 of 2016
20.01.2016
R.Kannan
District Collector, Ramanathapuram
Tahsildar, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram
Inspector of Police, Perunazhi
Vel @ Veerapathiran
Vellaisamy
V.Ramasubramanian
N.Kirubakaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court