Allowed

V.Krishnamoorthy, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC15 Mar 2016WP/9514/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras issued a writ of mandamus directing the Regional Transport Officers to receive and consider applications for Autorickshaw permits filed in Form CCPA along with the prescribed fee within six weeks, without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to receive Form CCPA applications with fees and consider them on merits within six weeks.

V.Krishnamoorthy, Vs The Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 15.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.9514 to 9520 of 2016

¶6

V.Krishnamoorthy ... Petitioner in W.P.9514 of 2016 S.Rajesh ... Petitioner in W.P.9515 of 2016 P.Murugan ... Petitioner in W.P.9516 of 2016 M.Murugan ... Petitioner in W.P.9517 of 2016 M.Petchi Rajan ... Petitioner in W.P.9518 of 2016 G.Ragu ... Petitioner in W.P.9519 of 2016 C.Shanmugam ... Petitioner in W.P.9520 of 2016 Vs. The Regional Transport Officer, Sholinganallur, Chennai – 600 119. ... Respondent in W.P.9514/2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Meenambakkam, Chennai – 600 016. ... Respondent in W.P.9515/2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Kundrathur, Chennai – 600 122. ... Respondent in W.P.9516 to 9520/2016

¶7

Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 03.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶8

The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 03.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

2.Mr.A.Zakir Hussain, learned Government Advocate taking notice for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law.

¶11

3.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 03.02.2016 in Form-CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶12

4.With this observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs. va Sd/Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To 1.The Regional Transport Officer, Sholinganallur, Chennai – 600 119.

¶13

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Meenambakkam, Chennai – 600 016.

¶14

3.The Regional Transport Officer, Kundrathur, Chennai – 600 122. + 7 ccs to Mr.K.Hariharan, Advocate Sr 16431 + 1 cc to The Govt.Pleader, Sr 16637

¶15

KR/18/3/16

¶16

W.P.Nos.9514 to 9520 of 2016

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Krishnamoorthy, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Krishnamoorthy, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Saravana Selvarathnam Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

N.Kalaiselvi, Vs The District Collector

M/s.Regen Infrastructure and Vs The Central Board of Direct

Manjusree Plantations Limited, Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Vijay Sales Corporation Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax

M/s.Pawan Cargo Forwards Vs The Principal Commissioner of