The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by an Accountant seeking regularisation of services and seniority adjustment, ruling the petitioner ineligible due to lack of required qualification on the crucial date.
Writ petition dismissed; no consequential directions issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 20.07.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P. No.9505 of 2007 [O.A.No.1585 of 2003]
V.Seethalakshmi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by Secretary to Government, Finance (T. & A.) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai – 600 015. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent relating to Proc.D.Dis.No.22244/2001/M2, dated 27.06.2002, quash the same and issue consequential directions to revise and advance the date of regularisation of services in the post of Accountant from 13.03.1975 to 24.09.1974 and to fix her inter-se seniority accordingly with all consequential benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi For Respondents : Mr.S.Gunasekaran
Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the second respondent relating to Proc.D.Dis.No.22244/2001/M2, dated 27.06.2002, quash the same and issue consequential directions to revise and advance the date of regularisation of services in the post of Accountant from 13.03.1975 to 24.09.1974 and to fix her inter-se seniority accordingly with all consequential benefits.
2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner is not eligible on the crucial date as she was not qualified the required qualification.
3.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sri
To
1.The Secretary to Government,
Finance (T. & A.) Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Treasuries
and Accounts,
Chennai – 600 015.
+1cc to Mr.M.Rani, Advocate Sr.41238
+1cc to the Government Pleader sr.41280
W.P. No.9505 of 2007
svi[co] srg 10/08/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for regularisation of services and fixing of inter-se seniority given lack of qualification on the crucial date.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Seethalakshmi
Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government, Finance (T. & A.) Department
The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts
B. Rajendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
