Disposed

R.Uma, v. The Transport Commissioner

Madras HC14 Mar 2016WP/9414/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct the Regional Transport Officer to receive their applications for grant of Autorickshaw permit. The court directed the respondent to receive applications and consider them within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to receive applications and consider them on merits within six weeks.

R.Uma, Vs The Transport Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 14.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.9414 to 9432 of 2016

¶6

R.Uma ... Petitioner in W.P.9414 of 2016 C.Velankanni ... Petitioner in W.P.9415 of 2016 A.Venkatesan ... Petitioner in W.P.9416 of 2016 A.Thameem Ansari ... Petitioner in W.P.9417 of 2016 S.Murugan ... Petitioner in W.P.9418 of 2016 S.Arokiyaraj ... Petitioner in W.P.9419 of 2016 V.Mohanraj ... Petitioner in W.P.9420 of 2016 K.Malarjothi ... Petitioner in W.P.9421 of 2016 P.Siva ... Petitioner in W.P.9422 of 2016 M.Shabana ... Petitioner in W.P.9423 of 2016 A.Mariyam Beebi ... Petitioner in W.P.9424 of 2016 S.Masilamani ... Petitioner in W.P.9425 of 2016 B.Prema ... Petitioner in W.P.9426 of 2016 N.Baskar ... Petitioner in W.P.9427 of 2016 N.Lalitha ... Petitioner in W.P.9428 of 2016 K.Shanmugam ... Petitioner in W.P.9429 of 2016 K.Sivakumar ... Petitioner in W.P.9430 of 2016 N.Suresh ... Petitioner in W.P.9431 of 2016 N.Nathamalli ... Petitioner in W.P.9432 of 2016 Vs.

¶7

1.The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶8

^st Respondent in all W.Ps.

¶9

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (North), Chennai. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.9414 to 9426/16 3.The Regional Transport Officer, Redhills, Chennai.

¶10

^nd Respondent in W.P.9427, 9428/16

¶11

4.The Regional Transport Officer, Tiruvallur. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.9429, 9430/2016 5.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (Central), Chennai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.9431/16

¶12

6.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (North East), Chennai.

¶13

... 2^nd Respondent in W.P.9432/2016

¶14

Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 11.01.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶15

The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue writ of mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 11.01.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶16

2.Mr.M.S.Ramesh, learned Additional Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents submitted that the 2^nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law.

¶17

3.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2^nd respondent to receive the petitioners' applications dated 11.01.2016 in Form-CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

4.With this observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶19

/true copy/

¶20

Sub Asst. Registrar

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

¶23

1.The Transport Commissioner,
State Transport Authority,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai (North), Chennai.
3.The Regional Transport Officer,
Redhills, Chennai.
4.The Regional Transport Officer,
Tiruvallur.
5.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai (Central), Chennai.
6.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai (North East), Chennai.
+ 1 CC TO THE GOVT.PLEADER, SR 16314
+ 19 CCS TO MR.S.GOVINDRAMAN, ADVOCATE SR 16163
KR/16/3/16
W.P.Nos.9414 to 9432 of 2016

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Uma, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Uma, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hotel Riga Residency Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Tvl.Camera Citi Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Tvl. Rasi Tax (In) P Ltd. Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

A.L.Gayathri Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax

A.Kani, Vs The Transport Commissioner

R.Ganesan Vs The Transport Commissioner