Allowed

S.Rajkumar v. The Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC10 Mar 2016WP/9011/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed Regional Transport Officers across Chennai zones to receive and consider authorickshaw permit applications filed by petitioners in form CCPA along with prescribed fees.

What did the court decide?

Direct the respondent to receive the respective applications of the petitioners dated 03.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and consider the same on merit

S.Rajkumar Vs The Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 10.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.9011 to 9021 of 2016

¶6

S. Rajkumar .... Petitioner in WP No.9011 of 2016 M. Pachayappan .... Petitioner in WP No.9012 of 2016 S. Prabu .... Petitioner in WP No.9013 of 2016 K.K. Gopal .... Petitioner in WP No.9014 of 2016 R. Sathyanathan .... Petitioner in WP No.9015 of 2016 S. Muthamizhan .... Petitioner in WP No.9016 of 2016 D. Nagappan .... Petitioner in WP No.9017 of 2016 M. Asees .... Petitioner in WP No.9018 of 2016 P. Nageshwar Rao .... Petitioner in WP No.9019 of 2016 L. Srikanth .... Petitioner in WP No.9020 of 2016 M. Sivakumar .... Petitioner in WP No.9021 of 2016 v. The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-Central, Chennai – 600 023 ... Respondent in WP No.9011 of 2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-North, Chennai – 600 099 ... Respondent in WP Nos.9012, 9015, 9017, 9018 of 2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-North-West, Chennai – 600 049 ... Respondent in WP No.9013 of 2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-North-East, Chennai – 600 081 .... Respondent in WP No.9014 of 2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-South-West, Chennai-600 092 .... Respondent in WP Nos.9016, 9019 of 2016

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

The Regional Transport Officer, Redhills, Chennai – 600 052 .... Respondent in WP Nos.9020 and 9021 of 2016

¶9

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writs of Mandamus, directing the respective respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 03.02.2016 in form CCPA with the prescribed fee for the grant of a Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶10

For Petitioners in all : Mr.K. Hariharan the writ petitions

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.S. Diwakar Addl.Govt.Pleader.

¶12

COMMON ORDER

¶13

The petitioners have filed the above writ petitions to issue writs of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 03.02.2016 in form CCPA with the prescribed fee for the grant of a Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶14

Mr.S. Diwakar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents and submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law.

¶15

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioners, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to receive the respective applications of the petitioners dated 03.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)

¶17

True Copy

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

To
1. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-Central,
Chennai – 600 023
2. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-North,
Chennai – 600 099
3. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-North-West,
Chennai – 600 049
4. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-North-East,
Chennai – 600 081
5. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai-South-West,
Chennai-600 092
6. The Regional Transport Officer,
Redhills,
Chennai – 600 052
+ 11 ccs to Mr.K.Hariharan, Advocate SR 15567 (14/3/16)
skv(co)
prk11/3
W.P.Nos.9011 to 9021 of 2016

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Rajkumar v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Rajkumar v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Icmc Corporation Ltd. Vs Preventive Officer, Office of

Mr.J.Shivakumar Vs The Principal Commissioner

M/s.Pakkar Leather Export Co., Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

M/s.Divya Impex Vs State of Tamilnadu

M/s.Trivitron Health Care P Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

P.Udhayakumar, Vs The Transport Commissioner