A.Rangasamy, v. The Block Development Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court permitted the petitioner to submit a fresh representation with documents. The respondents were directed to consider the representation, afford an opportunity of personal hearing, and pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks without the Court expressing an opinion on merits.
What did the court decide?
Permission to submit fresh representation; direction to respondents to hear parties and pass orders within twelve weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.04.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
Writ Petition No.8115 of 2016
and WMP.No.7232 of 2016
A.Rangasamy ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Block Development Officer, Veerapandi Panchayat Union, Ariyanur, Salem Taluk, Salem District.
- The Block Development officer (Village Panchayat) Veerapandi Panchayat Union, Ariyanur, Salem Taluk, Salem District.
- The District Collector, Salem District, Salem.
- The Project Director, District Rural Development Administration Agency, Salem.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents should be directed to relocate the Village Panchayat Service Centre from Sevampalayam to the petitioner's village based on land gifted by the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Rangasamy
- respondent
Block Development Officer, Veerapandi Panchayat Union
- respondent
District Collector, Salem
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court