The High Court dismissed the writ petition and connected miscellaneous petitions for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court despite prior notice.
Petition and connected MPs dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 01.12.2016
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Writ Petition No.775 of 2014 & MP.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014
PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned order dated 28.9.2013 in proceeding No.82305/E3/2013 issued by the first respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to release the vehicle.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Diwakar, SGP ORDER Neither the learned counsel for the petitioner nor the petitioner is present in Court when the case is called. On the previous occasion i.e on 23.11.2016, when the matter was taken up, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Thus, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Sd/Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
+1 CC to The Government Pleader, SR.No.71664
WP.No.775 of 2014 &
WMP.Nos.1 & 2/2014
CO-GMI ths : 29.12.2016
C. Muniyan
Regional Transport Officer, Coimbatore West
Motor Vehicles Inspector Gr-II, Regional Transport Office, Coimbatore West
T.S.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
