A writ petition challenging the extension of a bar license to a third respondent was closed by the Court due to a subsequent event rendering the matter moot, without intervening in the merits or granting relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:01/6/2016
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.76 of 2015 and MP.No.1 of 2015
S.Vetrivel
...Petitioner
Vs.
2.Sivakumar
3.Balaji ...Respondents
PETITION under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the first respondent from extending license for running the bar pertaining to the TASMAC shop No.4013 situated at Door No.103, GST Road, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District to anyone other than the petitioner as he is the highest bidder.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Ashok Kumar
For Respondent-1 : Mr.B.Nedunchezhiyan
For Respondent-3 : Mr.P.Nagarajan
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed to forbear the first respondent from extending the bar licence to the third respondent.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC), Office of the District Manager, Orikai Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.
+1cc to Mr.B.Nedunchezhiyan, Advocate S.R.No.29191
KR/13/6/16
W.P.No.76 of 2015 & MP.No.1 of 2015
S.Vetrivel
The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd (TASMAC)
Sivakumar
Balaji
T.S.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
