S.Gurusamy v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court declined to adjudicate on a writ petition seeking to quash a public auction/tender notice after the respondent municipality clarified that the auction had already been deferred. The petition was subsequently closed.
What did the court decide?
No relief was granted; the writ petition was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE : 23.3.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.6967 of 2016
and
W.M.P.Nos.6183 & 6184 of 2016
S.Gurusamy ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Commissioner Dharmapuri Municipality, Dharmapuri. ... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the public auction/tender notice dated 12.02.2016 made in Na.Ka.No.452/2016/A3 on the file of the respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Munusamy
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition seeking quashing of a public auction/tender notice requires adjudication when the tender has already been postponed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Gurusamy
- respondent
The Commissioner Dharmapuri Municipality, Dharmapuri
Coram
T.S.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court