Partly allowed

M/s.Satyam Dewatering System, v. The Micro & Small Enterprises

Madras HC8 Jan 2016WP/596/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single Judge disposed of four writ petitions filed by a petitioner, a dewatering firm, against the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and private respondents. Judicial review order directs the council to consider pending references and pass merits within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

First respondent directed to consider pending references and pass orders on merits with personal hearing within six weeks.

M/s.Satyam Dewatering System, Vs The Micro… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.01.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.596 to 599 of 2016

¶6

M/s.Satyam Dewatering System represented by Ankit Mathur General Manager

¶7

... Petitioner in all WPs

¶8

Vs 1. The Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council represented by Regional Joint Director of Industries and Commerce/Zonal Officer, Chennai Region, Thiru Vi.Ka.Indl.Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. ... 1^st respondent in all WPs 2. M/s.Rukmani Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Plot No.242, District Center, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar 751 016, Odisha. ... 2^nd Respondent in WP.596/2016 3. M/s.CISCONS Projects Pvt. Ltd. No.604, Tirumala Shah Residency, Yellareddy Guda, Ameerpet, Hyderabad 530 073. ... 2^nd Respondent in WP.597/2016 4. M/s.N & N Constructions Pvt. Ltd. No.9-25-3/7, Sai Sri Vihar Apartments, CBM Compound, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530 007. ... 2^nd Respondent in WP.598/2016 5. M/s.Punj Lloyd Ltd. Corporate Office I, No.78, Institutional Area, Sector 32, Gurgaon - 122 001. ... 2^nd Respondent in WP.599/2016

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

Common Prayer:

¶11

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to complete the conciliation proceedings initiated under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 on the reference made by the petitioner vide petitions dated 01.10.2015, 02.09.2015, 27.10.2015 and 25.04.2015 for the dispute against the second respondent within a stipulated time to be fixed by this Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali in all WPs For 1^st Respondent : Mr.R.M.Muthukumar, GA in all WPs

¶13

COMMON ORDER

¶14

By consent, all the writ petitions are taken up for final disposal.

¶15

2.The petitioner has filed these writ petitions seeking a direction to the first respondent to complete the conciliation proceedings initiated under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 on the reference made by the petitioner vide petitions dated 01.10.2015, 02.09.2015, 27.10.2015 and 25.04.2015 for the dispute against the second respondent within the period stipulated time by this Court.

¶16

3.According to the petitioner, the petitioner is a partnership firm and engaged in the business of providing dewatering systems at affordable prices. While so, the second respondent in all the writ petitions approached and requested the services of the petitioner in their respective plants. Accordingly, the petitioner submitted their proposals and the second respondent placed work orders. Pursuant to the same, the petitioner completed their projects and raised bills. But the second respondent failed to pay the same, which compelled the petitioner to issue legal notice to them. However, the second respondent neither sent reply nor paid any amount to the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner made petitions dated 01.10.2015, 02.09.2015, 27.10.2015 and 25.04.2015 under section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act 2006 to the first respondent and the same are pending without any progress. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶17

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate, who took notice for the first respondent.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court, without going into the issue involved herein, directs the first respondent to consider the petitions filed by the petitioners dated 01.10.2015, 02.09.2015, 27.10.2015 and 25.04.2015 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of personal hearing to all the parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

6.All the writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶21

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
rk
To
The Regional Joint Director of Industries/
Zonal Officer,Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation
Council
Chennai Region,
Thiru Vi.Ka.Indl.Estate,
Guindy, Chennai 600 032.
+4 ccs to M/S.R.Murali Advocate sr.1569, 1570
+1 cc to Government Pleader sr.2221
W.P.Nos.596 to 599 of 2016
ppa(co)
aa28/01/2016

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Satyam Dewatering System, v. The Micro & Small Enterprises

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Satyam Dewatering System, v. The Micro & Small Enterprises

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.M.Govindaswamy Vs The Regional Transport

M/s.Sree Shanthosh Steels Pvt. Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

M/s. Megha & Co., Vs The State of Tamil Nade

M/s.Shree Sai Traders Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Kandhasamy Vs The Senior Regional Manager

V.Manikandan Vs The Regional Transport Officer