Partly allowed

M/s. P.K.Battery service, v. The Commercial Tax Officer

Madras HC15 Apr 2016WP/5628/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside Demand Notices issued without an assessment order and without an opportunity for personal hearing or filing objections. It directed the respondent to obtain objections and pass a proper assessment order after a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Impugned Demand Notices set aside; Petitioner directed to file objections within two weeks; Respondent directed to pass assessment order after hearing.

M/s. P.K.Battery service, Vs The Commercial Tax… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 15.04.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.5628, 5629 and 5630 of 2016 and WMP Nos.4978, 4979 and 4980 of 2016

¶6

M/s P.K. Battery Service,

¶7

Rep by its Proprietrix – P. Kaliammal, No.143, Trichy Road, Namakkal, Namakkal District ... Petitioner in all the Writ Petitions

¶8

¶9

The Commercial Tax Officer, Namakkal (Town) Circle, Namakkal, Namakkal District ... Respondent in all the Writ Petitions

¶10

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue Writs of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the respondent in its impugned proceedings made in TNGST No.33753120072/15-16(5)/ Na.Ka.2218/2013/A3 (in WP No.5628 of 2016); 33753120072/(6)1516/Na.Ka.No.2216/2015/A3(in WP No.5629 of 2016) and 33753120072/ (7)/15-16 (in WP No.5630 of 2016)dated 16.12.2015 and quash the same.

¶11

For petitioner : Ms.R.Hemalatha For respondents : Mr.S. Kanmani Annamalai Additional Government Pleader(T) COMMON ORDER

¶12

The petitioner has filed the above writ petitions to issue Writs of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the respondent in its impugned proceedings made in TNGST No.33753120072/15-16(5)/Na.Ka.2218/2013/A3 (in WP No.5628 of 2016); 33753120072/(6)15-16/Na.Ka.No.2216/2015 and 33753120072/ (7)/15-16 dated 16.12.2015 and quash the same.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent had issued the Demand Notices, even without an order of Assessment, being passed against the petitioner.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the respondent had passed the demand notices dated 16.12.2015, without giving an opportunity to the petiitoner to file their objections and without affording due opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, the impugned notices, issued by the respondent, are liable to be set aside.

¶16

Mr.S. Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondent, submitted that since the impugned notices were issued, without an assessment order, being passed against the petitioner, the same can be set aside.

¶17

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and taking note of the fact that the respondent had issued the impugned notices dated 16.12.2015, without an order of assessment, being passed against the petiiotner and without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to file their objections, the imugned notices dated 16.12.2015 are liable to be set aside and accordingly, they are set aside. The petitioner is directed to file their objections within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the respondent is directed to pass the order of assessment, after considering the objections, to be filed by the petitioner and after affording due opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. With these observations, all the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Mps are closed.

¶18

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sr To The Commercial Tax Officer, Namakkal (Town) Circle, Namakkal, Namakkal District. +1cc to the Special Government Pleader(T), S.R.No.23708 W.P.Nos.5628 to 5630 of 2016 SK(CO) CA(06/05/2016)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s. P.K.Battery service, v. The Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. P.K.Battery service, v. The Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalki Driving School Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Tvl.Inma Enterprises Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Shri Subh Granites Private Ltd. Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Tvl.Niro Ceramic India Pvt. Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Om Marble & Granites Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

N.Shankar, Vs The Transport Commissioner