High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition for quashing the seizure of his driving license, directing the Regional Transport Officer to return it within a week while reserving the right to initiate future action if statutory violations occur.
Return of petitioner's driving licence within a week of receipt of order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:01.03.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.5438 of 2016
S.Karthikeyan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
2 The Inspector of Police,
Rasipuram Police Station,
Rasipuram, Namakkal.
..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein to return the petitioner's Driving Licence bearing DL. No. TN 33199660004547 which is valid up to 24.6.2018 forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ganesan
For Respondent : Mr.M.S.Ramesh Addl. Govt. Pleader
ORDER
The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to return his driving licence which is valid up to 24.6.2018, forthwith.
gave a written representation to the first respondent to return his driving licence, however, the same was not returned to the petitioner.
W.P.No.5438 of 2016
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
R.Ravi v. the Regional Transport Officer, ChennaiFollowed¶18
2015(2)CTC 626 [R.Ravi v. the Regional Transport Officer, Chennai]
S. Karthikeyan
The Regional Transport Officer, Namakkal (West), Namakkal
The Inspector of Police, Rasipuram Police Station, Rasipuram, Namakkal
M. DURAISWAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
