S.Govindaraj v. The Appellate Authority/
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of orders was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with the court's permission.
The writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of orders was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with the court's permission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.04.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
Writ Petition No.5102 of 2016
and
WMP.Nos.4438 and 4439 of 2016
S.Govindaraj ... Petitioner
vs.
1.The Appellate Authority/
Secretary to Government,
Housing and Urban Development Department,
Govt. of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai 600 009.
2.Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority,
rep. by its Member Secretary,
No.1, Gandhi Irwin Salai,
Chennai 600 008.
3.The Chief Administrative Officer,
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority,
No.1, Gandhi Irwin Salai,
Chennai 600 008.
4.Corporation of Chennai,
rep. by its Commissioner,
Rippon Buildings,
Chennai 600 003. ... Respondents
Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned orders passed by the third respondent in his Letter No.K2/6035/14 dated 06.10.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the appeal dated 27.09.2012 filed by the petitioner under section 45(1)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Specified Commodities Market (Regulation of Location) Act 1996 in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Premkumar For R1 : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, SGP For R2 & R3 : Mr.Karthikeyan For R4 : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition. He also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS IV )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
rk
To
1.The Appellate Authority/
Secretary to Government,
Housing and Urban Development Department,
Govt. of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai 600 009.
2.Member Secretary,
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority,
No.1, Gandhi Irwin Salai,
Chennai 600 008.
3.The Chief Administrative Officer,
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority,
No.1, Gandhi Irwin Salai,
Chennai 600 008.
4.Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai 600 003.
W.P.No.5102 of 2016
PVS (CO)
kk 3/5
G.Voindaraj
The Appellate Authority/ Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
The Chief Administrative Officer, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
Corporation of Chennai
R.SUBBIAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court