In Writ Petition No. 43195 of 2016 before the Madras High Court, the petitioner approached the court under Article 226. The court allowed the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the petition and subsequently dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without ordering any costs.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.12.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
Writ Petition No. 43195 of 2016
B. Murugan ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The General Manager
State Bank of India
No.16, College Road
Nungambakkam
Chennai - 600 006
2. The Branch Manager
State Bank of India (Bank Code 758)
Gingee
Villupuram District - 604 202 ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of
India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the second
respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated
17.11.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr. A. Jayaprakash
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitiner seeks to
withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement
to that effect. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India should be dismissed upon the withdrawal of the petition by the petitioner.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
B. Murugan
The General Manager State Bank of India
The Branch Manager State Bank of India
B. Rajendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
