K.Srinivasan v. The Tahsildhar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 challenging RTI procedure was dismissed as withdrawn after petitioner sought permission to withdraw.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.12.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
WRIT PETITION No.42646 of 2016
K.Srinivasan ... Petitioner
vs.
1. The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office,
Bhavani Taluk,
Erode District.
2. The Public Information Officer,
Taluk Office,
Bhavani Taluk,
Erode District.
3. The Registrar,
State Information Commission,
No.2, Thiyagaraja Salai,
Alliyamman Koil Street,
Teynampet, Chennai. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing
the second respondent to consider the petitioner's
representation letter dated 19.05.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.Pari Gopal For Respondents: Mr.S.Rajeswaran, Special Government Pleader O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.
- In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Srinivasan
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District
- respondent
The Public Information Officer, Taluk Office, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District
- respondent
The Registrar, State Information Commission, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court