Allowed

G.Manikandan v. The Transport Commissioner

Madras HC5 Jan 2016WP/40856/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A common order in multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution directing Regional Transport Officers to receive, consider, and issue autorickshaw permits to petitioners within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing respective Regional Transport Officers to receive applications, consider them, and pass orders for grant of autorickshaw permit within four weeks.

G.Manikandan Vs The Transport Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.01.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.40856 to 40873 of 2015

¶6

G.Manikandan ...Petitioner in WP.40856/15 A.Anrose ...Petitioner in WP.40857/15 A.Aonastraj ...Petitioner in WP.40858/15 T.Lalitha ...Petitioner in WP.40859/15 S.Sumathi ...Petitioner in WP.40860/15 K.Sangeetha ...Petitioner in WP.40861/15 A.Shakila Bhanu ...Petitioner in WP.40862/15 R.Yogaraj ...Petitioner in WP.40863/15 S.Ashok Kumar ...Petitioner in WP.40864/15 V.Manimaran ...Petitioner in WP.40865/15 S.Ravindar ...Petitioner in WP.40866/15 M.Mariyammal ...Petitioner in WP.40867/15 V.Renugadevi ...Petitioner in WP.40868/15 N.Mageswari ...Petitioner in WP.40869/15 P.K.John Puruthsaman ...Petitioner in WP.40870/15 M.Raghu ...Petitioner in WP.40871/15 P.Egambaram ...Petitioner in WP.40872/15 P.Chandrasekar ...Petitioner in WP.40873/15 Vs. 1. The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. ...1st Respondent in all WPs

¶7

The Regional Transport Officer, Sholinganallur, Chennai.

¶8

...2nd Respondent in WPs.40856 to 40860/15

¶9

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North - East, Chennai. ...2nd Respondent in WPs.40861 to 40863/15

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai East, Chennai.

¶12

...2nd Respondent in WPs.40864, 40865 & 40870/15

¶13

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North, Chennai.

¶14

...2nd Respondent in WPs.40866 to 40869/15

¶15

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North - West, Chennai.

¶16

...2nd Respondent in WP.40871/15

¶17

The Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee, Chennai.

¶18

...2nd Respondent in WP.40872/15

¶19

The Regional Transport Officer, Red Hills, Chennai.

¶20

...2nd Respondent in WP.40873/15

¶21

COMMON PRAYER : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 05.10.2015, in Form CCPA with the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw Permit and to consider the same and pass further orders.

¶22

For petitioners in all WPs : Mr.S.Govindraman
For respondents in all WPs : Mr.R.M.Muthukumar,
Government Advocate
C O M M O N O R D E R

¶23

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking the common relief of issuing a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Regional Transport Authority concerned to receive the respective application of the petitioners in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of autorickshaw permit and to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

Mr.R.M.Muthukumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respective respondents.

¶26

Without going into the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respective Regional Transport Officer concerned to receive the applications of the petitioners, consider the same and pass appropriate orders for grant of autorickshaw permit, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶27

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rk
To
1. The Transport Commissioner,
State Transport Authority,
Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
2. The Regional Transport Officer,
Sholinganallur, Chennai.
3. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai North - East, Chennai.
4. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai East, Chennai.
5. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai North, Chennai.

¶28

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North - West, Chennai. 7. The Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee, Chennai.

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

The Regional Transport Officer, Red Hills, Chennai.

¶31

+18cc's to Mr.S.Govindraman, Advocate, S.R.No.501 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.976

¶32

W.P.Nos.40856 to 40873 of 2015

¶33

SCD(CO)
CA(19/01/2016)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Manikandan v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Manikandan v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Perumal Vs K.Veera Raghava Rao IAS

M/s.Badani Jewellers Vs The Deputy Commissioner (Ct)

M/s.Bismillah Industrial Vs The Assistant Commissioner

M.Giri, Vs The District Collector

M/s. Shree Bhahubali Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Mahindra Residential Vs The Commissioner of Income-Tax