Disposed

D.Sankar v. The Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC4 Jan 2016WP/40758/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a common order, this One Judge Bench disposed of multiple writ petitions by directing the respective Regional Transport Officers to accept applications, receive fees, and consider grant of autorickshaw permits on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respective RTA to receive applications, consider them, and pass orders on merits for grant of autorickshaw permits within four weeks.

D.Sankar Vs The Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.01.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.40758 to 40765 of 2015

¶6

D.Sankar .. Petitioner in
WP.40758/2015
K.Balaji .. Petitioner in
WP.40759/2015
Isak Thambi Raj .. Petitioner in
WP.40760/2015
P.Balasubramaniyan .. Petitioner in
WP.40761/2015
T.Muthu .. Petitioner in
WP.40762/2015
F.Mohamed Jamaludeen .. Petitioner in
WP.40763/2015
R.Yuvaraj Babu .. Petitioner in
WP.40764/2015
A.Sakthi Vel .. Petitioner in
WP.40765/2015
Vs.
The Regional Transport Officer
Tambaram,
Chennai 600 045. .. Respondent
in WP.40758 & 40759/2015
The Regional Transport Officer
Poonamallee,
Chennai 600 056. .. Respondent
in WP.40760 & 40761/2015

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

The Regional Transport Officer Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 119. .. Respondent in WP.40762/2015

¶9

The Regional Transport Officer Meenambakkam, Chennai 600 016. .. Respondent

¶10

in WP.40763 & 40764/2015

¶11

The Regional Transport Officer Kundrathur, Chennai 600 122. .. Respondent in WP.40765/2015

¶12

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioners dated 19.11.2015, in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw Permit and to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

For petitioners : Mr.K.Hariharan For respondents : Mr.R.M.Muthukumar, GA C O M M O N O R D E R

¶14

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking the common relief of issuing a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Regional Transport Authority concerned to receive the respective application of the petitioners in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of autorickshaw permit and to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶15

Mr.R.M.Muthukumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respective respondent.

¶16

Without going into the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respective Regional Transport Officer concerned to receive the applications of the petitioners, consider the same and pass appropriate orders for grant of autorickshaw permit, on merits and in

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rk
To
1.The Regional Transport Officer, Tambaram, Chennai 600 045.
2.The Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056.
3.The Regional Transport Officer, Sholinganallur, Chennai 600
119.
4.The Regional Transport Officer, Meenambakkam, Chennai 600 016.
5.The Regional Transport Officer, Kundrathur, Chennai 600 122.
+8 ccs of M/s.K.Hariharan, Advocate, sr.36
+1 cc to The Government Pleader, sr.235
W.P.Nos.40758 to 40765 of 2015
ug co
kra 11.01.2016

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Sankar v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Sankar v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Prakash Gold Palace Vs The Commissioner of Customs

K.P.Mohanasundaram Vs Tmt.S.Nalini

M/S.Crs Sons & Co.Ltd Vs the Income Tax Officer

A.Moorthy, S/o.Arumugam, Vs Tamilnadu Small Industries

M/s. Blendsteel Engineering Vs The Commissioner of Commercial

D.Dhanapal Vs The Regional Transport Officer