Disposed

Mrs.D.Pavai, v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC6 Oct 2016WP/35328/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the Inspector of Police. Upon receipt, the Inspector was directed to conduct an enquiry and provide police protection to fence the petitioner's property as necessary.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent for an enquiry and necessary police protection.

Mrs.D.Pavai, Vs The Superintendent of Police — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 06.10.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH

¶5

W.P. No.35328 of 2016

¶6

D. Pavai Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

1 The Superintendent of Police Vellore Vellore District

¶9

2 The Inspector of Police Pallikonda Police Station Vellore District Respondents

¶10

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give police protection to fence property owned by the petitioner to an extent of acre 2.46 in Survey No.765/2B and 765/3 of Agaramcherry Village, Ambur Taluk, Vellore District as detailed in the petition dated 26.08.2016 to the respondents in a time bound manner.

¶11

For petitioner : Mr. K. Mohanamurali For respondents: Mr. C. Emalias Addl. Public Prosecutor

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give police protection to fence the property owned by the petitioner to an extent of acre 2.46 in Survey No.765/2B and 765/3 of Agaramcherry Village, Ambur Taluk, Vellore District, as detailed in the petition dated 26.08.2016 to the respondents in a time bound manner.

¶14

2 Heard both sides.

¶15

3 It is seen that the petitioner has sent a representation dated 26.08.2016 by Registered Post with Acknowledgment Due to the Superintendent of Police, Vellore, seeking police protection to fence her property.

¶16

4 Under such circumstances, the petitioner is directed to go in person and give a fresh representation to the second respondent, viz., the Inspector of Police, Pallikonda Police Station, Vellore and on such representation being given, the second respondent is directed to call both the parties and conduct an enquiry and take action in accordance with law and give police protection to the petitioner, if necessary.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Costs made easy.

¶19

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
cad
To
1 The Superintendent of Police
Vellore, Vellore District
2 The Inspector of Police
Pallikonda Police Station, Vellore District
3 The Public Prosecutor
Madras High Court, Chennai 600 104
+1 CC to M/S.K.Mohanamurali, Advocate SR.No.57689
CO-EV
ths : 04.11.2016
W.P. No.35328 of 2016

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.D.Pavai, v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.D.Pavai, v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumar @ Pullikumar Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Ramesh M/a 38 Years Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Ramesh Vs the Assistant Registrar of

R.Vellaiyan, S/o.Raman, Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

N.Gowri, Vs The Inspector of Police

Viji @ Vijayakumar Vs the State Rep. by