Disposed

Mr.J.Varadhan, Staff No.61549 v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Madras HC5 Oct 2016WP/35222/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge discharged its jurisdiction to decide on merits, relying on the Division Bench judgment dated 12.06.2015. The court directed the respondents to disburse the petitioners' retirement benefits in twelve equal monthly instalments.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions are disposed of; a direction is issued for respondents to disburse retirement benefits in 12 equal monthly instalments starting 1.1.2017.

Mr.J.Varadhan, Staff No.61549 Vs The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.10.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

¶5

Writ Petition Nos.35222 to 35225 of 2016

¶6

J.Varadhan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35222/2016 E.Subramaniyan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35223/2016 R.Manoharan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35224/2016 S.A.Venugopal ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35225/2016 Vs.

¶7

1 The Government of Tamilnadu Rep by its Principal Secretary Transport Department Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai-600 009. 2 The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (VPM) Ltd 3/137, Salamedu Valuthareddy Post Villupuram- 605 602. 3 The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust

¶8

Thiruvalluvar House Pallavan Salai Chennai-600 002. ... Respondents in W.P.No.35222 to 35224/2016

¶9

1 The Government of Tamilnadu Rep by its Principal Secretary Transport Department Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai-600 009. 2 The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (CBE) Ltd Head Office, No.37, Mettupalayam Road Coimbatore 641 043

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

3 The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust Thiruvalluvar House Pallavan Salai Chennai-600 002.

¶12

... Respondents in W.P.No.35225/2016

¶13

Prayer in W.P.No.35222/2016: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to settle the petitioner retirement benefits after to extend the benefits of pay revision in terms of settlement with enhanced Dearness Allowance and to pay all the retirement benefits payable to the petitioner including the Gratuity, Commutation of pension, Leave Encashment (EL), Pension arrears, pension DA Arrears, PF Arrears, Settlement arrears, DA Arrears with interest of 18% on delayed payment to the petitioner from 31.07.2014 the date of retirement to till the date of settlement of the terminal benefits to the petitioner by following the order passed in W.A. (MD) Nos. 383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015.

¶14

Prayer in W.P.No.35223/2016: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to settle the petitioner retirement benefits after to extend the benefits of pay revision in terms of settlement with enhanced dearness allowance and to pay all the retirement benefits payable to the petitioner including the Gratuity, Commutation of pension, Leave Encashment (EL), Pension arrears, pension DA Arrears, PF Arrears, Settlement arrears, DA Arrears with interest of 18% on delayed payment to the petitioner from 31.07.2014 the date of retirement to till the date of settlement of the terminal benefits to the petitioner by following the order passed in W.A. (MD) Nos. 383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015.

¶15

Prayer in W.P.No.35224/2016: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to settle the petitioner retirement benefits after to extend the benefits of pay revision in terms of settlement with enhanced dearness allowance and to pay all the retirement benefits payable to the petitioner including the Gratuity, Commutation of pension, Leave Encashment (EL), Pension arrears, pension DA Arrears, PF

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Arrears, Settlement arrears, DA Arrears with interest of 18% on delayed payment to the petitioner from 31.12.2013 the date of retirement to till the date of settlement of the terminal benefits to the petitioner by following the order passed in W.A. (MD) Nos. 383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015.

¶18

Prayer in W.P.No.35225/2016: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to settle the retirement benefits payable to the petitioner namely, Provident Fund Gratuity Arrears, Encashment of leave salary (EL), Encashment of Leave salary (ML-98), DA Arrears, pension Arrears, after extending the benefits of the settlement and after duly taken into account the enhanced dearness allowance and other eligible terminal benefits with interest of 18% on delayed payment to the petitioner from 31.12.2010 the date of retirement to till the date of settlement of the terminal benefits to the petitioner by following the order passed in W.A. (MD) Nos. 383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015.

¶19

By consent, the main writ petitions themselves are taken up for final disposal.

¶20

The petitioners joined the services of the Transport Corporation and they retired from service long before. The grievance of the petitioners is that though they retired from service long before, till date, they were not paid with the retirement benefits. In this regard, the petitioners submitted representations before the respondents, on various dates. However, till date, there was no response. Aggrieved against the same, the present Writ Petitions have been filed.

¶21

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel, who has taken notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶22

The issue involved in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madurai Bench of this Court dated 12.6.2015 made in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 (K.Rajendran & Others vs. The Tamil Nadu

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Madurai and others).

¶25

Following the said judgment, without going into the merits of the matter, the respondents are directed to disburse the aforementioned retiral benefits to the petitioners herein, in twelve equal monthly instalments, in the light of the common judgment passed by this Court in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 (K.Rajendran & Others vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Madurai and others), dated 12.06.2015. It is also made clear that the first instalment shall commence from 1.1.2017.

¶26

With the above direction, all the writ petitions
are disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1 The Principal Secretary
Government of Tamilnadu
Transport Department
Secretariat, Fort St. George
Chennai-600 009.
2 The Managing Director
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (VPM) Ltd
3/137, Salamedu
Valuthareddy Post
Villupuram- 605 602.
3 The Administrator
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Pension Fund Trust
Thiruvalluvar House
Pallavan Salai
Chennai-600 002.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

4 The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (CBE) Ltd Head Office, No.37, Mettupalayam Road Coimbatore 641 043

¶29

+3cc to Mr.P.Kannankumar, Advocate Sr.58120 +4cc to Mr.V.S.Jagadeesan, Advocate Sr.57262 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.57527

¶30

W.P.Nos.35222 to
35225 of 2016
lrs[co]
srg 15/11/2016

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mr.J.Varadhan, Staff No.61549 v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.J.Varadhan, Staff No.61549 v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Ruckumaniamma Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

K.Nagammal, Vs The State of Tamilnadu

K. Sriraman Vs The Chairman and the Managing

R.Annadurai, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

C.Deiva, Vs The District Collector

V.Murugan, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu