T.I.Cycles of India v. the Presiding Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The Lok Adalat settled a writ petition challenging a Labour Court award between T.I. Cycles and its workers. Petitioner and respondents reached a compromise under the Industrial Disputes Act. Dues were paid to respondents and legal representatives of deceased workers.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed by recording terms of settlement. Dues paid to respondents and legal representatives. Memorial of Settlement forms part of award.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,CHENNAI
Lok Adalat-II organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee
Monday, the 21st day of November, 2016
LOK ADALAT AWARD
(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by
Members: Mr.S.Ramalingam Mrs.V.J.Latha
(Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent in C.P.No.83 of 2009 and quash its order dated 11.08.2011.) T.I.Cycles of India, Ambattur, Chennai 600 053 Rep.by its President. ...Petitioner /vs/ 1.The Presiding Officer, 1st Additional Labour Court, Chennai. 2.G.Perumal 3.P.S.James 4.P.R.Shanmugam 5.C.Vellaichamy 6.S.Thirugnanasambandam 7.K.S.Karuppiah ...Respondents
This case is taken up for settlement before this Forum. Petitioner and respondents 3, 6 and 7 are present. Mr.T.S.Gopalan and Co. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.V.Chockalingam, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 7. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:
AWARD
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition appealing against the Labour Court's award should be settled through compromise.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.I.Cycles of India
- respondent
The Presiding Officer, 1st Additional Labour Court, Chennai
- respondent
G. Perumal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court