Dismissed

D.Usha, v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC6 Sept 2016WP/32732/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by D. Usha seeking appointment as Sub Inspector of Police based on 1997-98 recruitment cut-off marks, relying on a prior single judge order in a related batch of writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

The petition for order of the court directing the respondents to select the petitioner as Sub Inspector of Police is dismissed. The connected M.P. is also dismissed.

D.Usha, Vs The Secretary to Government — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 06-09-2016

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN

¶4

Writ Petition No.32732 of 2014

¶5

D. Usha .. Petitioner

¶6

¶7

1.The Secretary to Government Home (Police II) Department Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The Director General of Police Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai Mylapore, Chennai-4. 3.The Chairman The T.N. Uniformed Services Recruitment Board Anna Salai, Chennai-2. ... Respondents

¶8

Prayer : The writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to select the petitioner for appointment as Sub Inspector of Police in pursuance of the cut off marks secured by him in the recruitment process conducted in the year 1997-98 as per the orders of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.9825 of 1998 etc., dated 19.7.2001 and also based on the the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.L.P.No.21828 of 2006 in Civil Appeal No.7667 of 2014 etc., dated 07.08.2014 and appoint him as Sub Inspector of Police and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits.

¶9

Heard the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents.

¶10

2.This writ petition has been filed, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

respondents to select and appoint the petitioner, as a Sub Inspector of Police, based on the cut off marks secured by him, in the recruitment held in the year 1997-98, in the light of the orders of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, in O.A.No.9825 of 1998, etc., batch, dated 19.7.2001, as well as the orders of the Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal No.7667 of 2014 etc., batch, dated 07.08.2014, and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits.

¶13

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents had placed before this Court, a copy of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, dated 27.01.2016, in a batch of writ petitions, in W.P.No.26325 of 2015 etc., batch, and had submitted that in view of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, in the above said batch of writ petitions, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

¶14

The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner had not refuted the said submissions made by the respondents' counsel.

¶15

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondents, and following the orders passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, dated 27.01.2016, in a batch of writ petitions, in W.P.No.26325 of 2015 etc., batch, this Court finds it appropriate to dismiss the writ petition. Hence, it is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is also dismissed.

¶16

-s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶17

rnb

¶18

To 1.The Secretary to Government Home (Police II) Department Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

2.The Director General of Police Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai Mylapore, Chennai-4.

¶21

3.The Chairman

¶22

The T.N. Uniformed Services Recruitment Board Anna Salai, Chennai-2.

¶23

+1 cc to Mr.S.Sivakumar Advocate sr 50971
+1 cc to Government Pleader sr 51649
Writ Petition No.32732 of 2014
aa26/09/2016

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Usha, v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Usha, v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Rajendran Vs The Inspector General of

R.Subbiah Naidu Vs The District Collector

P.Vanitha Vs Teachers Recruitment Board

Mrs.Uma Maheshwari Ramasamy, Vs The Tahsildar

K.M.Govindasamy, Vs The District Collector

K.Murugammal, Vs The Director